Add to Technorati Favorites
Showing posts with label Cities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cities. Show all posts

Monday, November 2, 2009

The World's Best Places to Live 2009


Best City To Live

In Mercer Consultings annual Quality of Living Survey, Europe once again dominates the list of 215 countries around the world. The top three cities are, by rank, Vienna, Zurich (The World's Best Places To Live 2008 last years winner), and Geneva. Commonwealth nations fare pretty well, too, winning 9 of the top 30 spots—even though London comes in only at 38. The U.S. also fares poorly, barely making it into the top 30 with Honolulu and San Francisco in the bottom two places. The best city to live in Asia is Singapore, at no. 26. No cities from Africa or South America are in the top 30. The bottom? Baghdad once again comes in at 215.


The Best Places To Live - Mercer's 2009 Quality of Living survey highlights - Global

  • European cities dominate the top of the ranking
  • Vienna scores highest for overall quality of living, Baghdad the lowest
  • Singapore ranks top for city infrastructure; London ranks eighth

The quality of living rankings the best places to live are based on a point-scoring index, which sees Vienna score 108.6, and Baghdad 14.4. Cities are ranked against New York as the base city with an index score of 100.

Mercer’s Quality of Living ranking covers 215 cities and is conducted to help governments and major companies place employees on international assignments. In 2008, the quality of living in many regions has been affected. This is demonstrated by serious political turmoil, increasing unrest and instability, health and climatic concerns. The global financial crisis has intensified in 2008, becoming an area of increasing international concern. The effects of various rescue plans being implemented are yet to be known.

This year’s ranking also identifies the cities with the best infrastructure based on electricity supply, water availability, telephone and mail services, public transport provision, traffic congestion and the range of international flights from local airports.

Mr Parakatil commented: “Infrastructure has a significant effect on the quality of living experienced by expatriates. Whilst often taken for granted when functioning to a high standard, a city’s infrastructure can generate severe hardship when it is lacking. Companies need to provide adequate allowances to compensate their international workers for these and other hardships.”

Top 5 quality of living ranking for cities worldwide




Top 5 ranking cities by region

Quality of living




Infrastructure




List Of The Best Places To Live


No. 1: Vienna, Austria



Mercer score: 108.6*
2008 rank: 2
GDP: $325 billion (2008 est.)**
Population: 1,664,146 (total city); 8,210,281 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.5

*The rankings are based on a point scoring index established by Mercer Consultings 2009 Quality of Living Survey, with Vienna scoring 108.6 and Baghdad scoring 14.4. Cities are compared with New York as the base city, with an index score of 100. The quality-of-living survey covers 215 cities and is conducted to help governments and major companies place employees on international assignments. The survey also identifies those cities with the highest personal safety ranking based on internal stability, crime, effectiveness of law enforcement, and relationships with other countries.

**The World Factbook. Gross domestic product is denominated in international dollars, which is based on Purchasing Power Parity.



No. 2: Zurich, Switzerland



Mercer score: 108
2008 rank: 1
GDP: 309.9 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,307,567 (total city); 7,604,467 (total country)
Life expectancy: 80.85



No. 3: Geneva, Switzerland



Mercer score: 107.9
2008 rank: 2
GDP: $309.9 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 438,177 (total city); 7,604,467 (total country)
Life expectancy: 80.85



No. 4 (tie): Vancouver, Canada



Mercer score: 107.4
2008 rank: 4
GDP: $1.3 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 2,285,900 (total city); 33,487,208 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.2



No. 4 (tie): Auckland, New Zealand



Mercer score: 107.4
2008 rank: 5
GDP: $116.6 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,303,068 (total city); 4,213,418 (total country)
Life expectancy: 80.36



No. 6: Dusseldorf, Germany



Mercer score: 107.2
2008 rank: 6
GDP: $2.86 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 581,858 (total city); 82,329,758 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.2



No. 7: Munich, Germany



Mercer score: 107
2008 rank: 7
GDP: $2.86 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,300,000 (total city); 82,329,758 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.2



No. 8: Frankfurt, Germany



Mercer score: 106.8
2008 rank: 7
GDP: $2.86 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 662,000 (total city); 82,329,758 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.2



No. 9: Bern, Switzerland



Mercer score: 106.5
2008 rank: 9
GDP: $309.9 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 962,983 (total city); 7,604,467 (total country)
Life expectancy: 80.85



No. 10: Sydney, Australia



Mercer score: 106.3
2008 rank: 10
GDP: $800.5 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 4,336,374 (total city); 21,262,641 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.6



No. 11: Copenhagen, Denmark



Mercer score: 106.2
2008 rank: 11
GDP: $204.9 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,875,129 (total city); 5,500,510 (total country)
Life expectancy: 78.3



No. 12: Wellington, New Zealand



Mercer score: 105.9
2008 rank: 12
GDP: $116.6 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 448,956 (total city); 4,213,418 (total country)
Life expectancy: 80.36



No. 13: Amsterdam, Netherlands



Mercer score: 105.7
2008 rank: 13
GDP: $670.2 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 740,000 (total city); 16,715,999 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.4



No. 14: Brussels, Belgium



Mercer score: 105.4
2008 rank: 14
GDP: $390.5 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,451,047 (total city); 10,414,336 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.22



No. 15: Toronto, Canada



Mercer score: 105.3
2008 rank: 15
GDP: $1.307 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 2,503,281 (total city); 33,487,208 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.23



No. 16 (tie): Ottawa, Canada



Mercer score: 105
2008 rank: 19
GDP: $1.307 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 812,129 (total city); 33,487,208 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.23



No. 16 (tie): Berlin, Germany



Mercer score: 105
2008 rank: 16
GDP: $2.863 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 3,398,888 (total city); 82,329,758 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.26



No. 18: Melbourne, Australia



Mercer score: 104.8
2008 rank: 17
GDP: $800.5 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 3,900,000 (total city); 21,262,641 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.63



No. 19 : Luxembourg



Mercer score: 104.6
2008 rank: 17
GDP: $39.42 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 491,775 (total city); 491,775 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.33



No. 20: Stockholm, Sweden



Mercer score: 104.5
2008 rank: 20
GDP: $348.6 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 810,120 (total city); 9,059,651 (total country)
Life expectancy: 80.86



No. 21: Perth, Australia



Mercer score: 104.3
2008 rank: 21
GDP: $800.5 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,554,769 (total city); 21,262,641 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.63



No. 22: Montreal, Canada



Mercer score: 104.2
2008 rank: 22
GDP: $1.3 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,620,693 (total city); 33,487,208 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.2



No. 23: Nuremberg, Germany



Mercer score: 104.1
2008 rank: 23
GDP: $2.86 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 500,132 (total city); 82,329,758 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.2



No. 24: Oslo, Norway



Mercer score: 103.7
2008 rank: 24
GDP: $265.5 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 560,484 (total city); 4,660,539 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.9



No. 25: Dublin, Ireland



Mercer score: 103.6
2008 rank: 25
GDP: $191.9 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 506,211 (total city); 4,203,200 (total country)
Life expectancy: 78.2



No. 26 (tie): Singapore



Mercer score: 103.5
2008 rank: 32
GDP: $240 billion (2008 est.)
Population: 4,657,542 (total city); 4,657,542 (total country)
Life expectancy: 79.2



No. 26 (tie): Calgary, Canada



Mercer score: 103.5
2008 rank: 25
GDP: $1.3 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,169,492 (total city); 33,487,208 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.2



No. 28: Hamburg, Germany



Mercer score: 103.4
2008 rank: 27
GDP: $1.3 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 1,169,492 (total city); 33,487,208 (total country)
Life expectancy: 81.2



No. 29: Honolulu, U.S.



Mercer score: 103.1
2008 rank: 28
GDP: $14.29 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 905,601 (total city); 307,212,123 (total country)
Life expectancy: 78.1



No. 30: San Francisco, U.S.



Mercer score: 103
2008 rank: 29
GDP: $14.29 trillion (2008 est.)
Population: 808,976 (total city); 307,212,123 (total country)
Life expectancy: 78.1

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Friday, July 3, 2009

World's Most Expensive Cities 2009



Japanese Cities Rise to the Top

The global recession may be showing some signs of easing, but try telling that to any foreign visitor to Japan. During the worst of the crisis, the Japanese yen soared against the dollar and other currencies. That slammed profits at Japanese exporters such as Toyota, Sony, and Panasonic. It also drove up the cost of living in Tokyo and other big Japanese cities. Indeed, Japanese cities are in four out of the top five slots in the annual ranking of the world's priciest cities by ECA International, a global human resources firm. The only non-Japanese city in the top five was Luanda, the capital of Angola.



No. 1 Luanda, Angola



2008 rank: 1

Movie ticket (in US$): 16.85
Quick lunch (in US$): 57.92
Washing machine (in US$): 1090.47
Kilo (2.2 pounds) of rice (in US$): 5.65
Can of soft drink (in US$): 1.30



No. 2 Tokyo, Japan




2008 rank: 13
Movie ticket: 19.16
Quick lunch: 16.48
Washing machine: 886.77
Kilo of rice: 8.45
Can of soft drink: 1.75



No. 3 Nagoya, Japan



2008 rank: 20
Movie ticket: 17.46
Quick lunch: 15.33
Washing machine: 899.97
Kilo of rice: 8.80
Can of soft drink: 1.57



No. 4 Yokohama, Japan



2008 rank: 15
Movie ticket: 18.48
Quick lunch: 17.11
Washing machine: 910.04
Kilo of rice: 6.28
Can of soft drink: 1.18



No. 5 Kobe, Japan



2008 rank: 29
Movie ticket: 16.92
Quick lunch: 14.96
Washing machine: 588.32
Kilo of rice: 7.09
Can of soft drink: 1.38



No. 6 Copenhagen, Denmark



2008 rank: 4
Movie ticket: 13.31
Quick lunch: 28.71
Washing machine: 1053.27
Kilo of rice: 4.24
Can of soft drink: 2.12



No. 7 Oslo, Norway



2008 rank: 2
Movie ticket: 12.84
Quick lunch: 32.65
Washing machine: 808.01
Kilo of rice: 4.40
Can of soft drink: 2.07



No. 8 Geneva, Switzerland



2008 rank: 6
Movie ticket: 14.07
Quick lunch: 27.57
Washing machine: 1213.67
Kilo of rice: 3.48
Can of soft drink: 1.02



No. 9 Zurich, Switzerland



2008 rank: 8
Movie ticket: 14.11
Quick lunch: 21.56
Washing machine: 978.45
Kilo of rice: 2.79
Can of soft drink: 0.99



No. 10 Basel, Switzerland



2008 rank: 9
Movie ticket: 13.73
Quick lunch: 21.15
Washing machine: 744.59
Kilo of rice: 3.01
Can of soft drink: 1.03



No. 11 Libreville, Gabon



2008 rank: 7
Movie ticket: 5.79
Quick lunch: 26.05
Washing machine: 771.29
Kilo of rice: 6.59
Can of soft drink: 1.10



No. 12 Bern, Switzerland



2008 rank: 10
Movie ticket: 14.43
Quick lunch: 21.11
Washing machine: 913.71
Kilo of rice: 3.05



No. 13 Stavanger, Norway



2008 rank: 3
Movie ticket: 13.32
Quick lunch: 29.83
Washing machine: 680.72
Kilo of rice: 3.99
Can of soft drink: 1.78



No. 14 Helsinki, Finland



2008 rank: 11
Movie ticket: 13.50
Quick lunch: 22.87
Washing machine: 767.41
Kilo of rice: 3.28
Can of soft drink: 1.96



No. 15 Paris, France



2008 rank: 19
Movie ticket: 12.67
Quick lunch: 27.84
Washing machine: 814.77
Kilo of rice: 4.22
Can of soft drink: 0.91



No. 16 Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire



2008 rank: 14
Movie ticket: 5.79
Quick lunch: 21.23
Washing machine: 1051.89
Kilo of rice: 6.24
Can of soft drink: 0.86



No. 17 Manhattan, N.Y.



2008 rank: 84
Movie ticket: 12.07
Quick lunch: 18.61
Washing machine: 1111.85
Kilo of rice: 5.01
Can of soft drink: 1.49



No. 18 Abuja, Nigeria



2008 rank: 16
Movie ticket: 10.37
Quick lunch: 24.68
Washing machine: 669.38
Kilo of rice: 7.79
Can of soft drink: 1.77



No. 19 Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo



2008 rank: 12
Movie ticket: 0.00
Quick lunch: 21.84
Washing machine: 626.38
Kilo of rice: 5.08
Can of soft drink: 1.51



No. 20 Baku, Azerbaijan



2008 rank: 109
Movie ticket: 11.14
Quick lunch: 21.45
Washing machine: 754.95
Kilo of rice: 4.25
Can of soft drink: 1.08



No. 21 Berlin, Germany



2008 rank:` 21
Movie ticket: 10.17
Quick lunch: 20.60
Washing machine: 829.89
Kilo of rice: 4.65
Can of soft drink: 1.24



No. 22 Vienna, Austria



2008 rank: 22
Movie ticket: 11.87
Quick lunch: 23.63
Washing machine: 990.29
Kilo of rice: 4.08
Can of soft drink: 1.15



No. 23 Moscow, Russia



2008 rank: 5
Movie ticket: 8.81
Quick lunch: 17.64
Washing machine: 629.55
Kilo of rice: 2.45
Can of soft drink: 0.97



No. 24 Tel Aviv, Israel



2008 rank: 38
Movie ticket: 8.37
Quick lunch: 24.47
Washing machine: 1019.22
Kilo of rice: 4.06
Can of soft drink: 1.81



No. 25 Honolulu, Hawaii



2008 rank: 88
Movie ticket: 9.36
Quick lunch: 20.88
Washing machine: 898.85
Kilo of rice: 4.01
Can of soft drink: 1.28



No. 26 Beijing, China



2008 rank: 104
Movie ticket: 9.99
Quick lunch: 17.88
Washing machine: 920.21
Kilo of rice: 2.54
Can of soft drink: 0.75



No. 27 Jerusalem, Israel



2008 rank: 39
Movie ticket: 8.37
Quick lunch: 30.29
Washing machine: 977.98
Kilo of rice: 4.38
Can of soft drink: 1.89



No. 28 Shanghai, China



2008 rank: 111
Movie ticket: 12.30
Quick lunch: 16.50
Washing machine: 700.50
Kilo of rice: 2.49
Can of soft drink: 0.57



No. 29 Hong Kong, China



2008 rank: 98
Movie ticket: 9.67
Quick lunch: 15.38
Washing machine: 701.37
Kilo of rice: 2.02
Can of soft drink (in US$): 0.88



No. 30 Strasbourg, France



2008 rank: 25
Movie ticket: 10.74
Quick lunch: 22.77
Washing machine: 756.43
Kilo of rice: 3.71
Can of soft drink: 0.83




Stumble Upon Toolbar
/* www.pageTracker.com code */